Used car check before purchase
Testing centre or expert · Private commission
This page begins with a distinction, because it determines expectations: the used car check is not a sovereign procedure. It appears in no ordinance, has no deadline, no form and no legal effect. It is a private commission to a testing centre or an expert — unlike the periodic roadworthiness test (Hauptuntersuchung, HU — commonly called TÜV), which is based on § 29 StVZO and results in an inspection sticker.
This leads to the second point, which often disappoints: a valid HU sticker is not proof of condition. Under the wording of § 29 StVZO, it certifies compliance with the regulations at the time of the inspection — and it examines different matters anyway from what a buyer wants to know. Wear on the clutch and gearbox, incipient oil loss, signs of accident damage, a backlog of maintenance or a rolled-back odometer are not part of the inspection scope under Annex VIIIa.
What the check actually delivers is threefold: a record of condition beyond the HU catalogue, an estimate of foreseeable costs and — often the most valuable — a documented finding at the time of purchase. Particularly in a private sale, where the legal guarantee is usually validly excluded, this is the only snapshot that can later serve as evidence.
A sentence up front, because it sets the roles straight: TÜV and DEKRA are not authorities. Annex VIII StVZO transfers the Hauptuntersuchung to two private, state-recognised figures — the officially recognised experts or examiners for motor vehicle traffic (aaSoP) of the technical testing centres and the test engineers (PI) of the officially recognised supervisory organisations. They certify, they do not impose sanctions. Who may prohibit the operation of a vehicle is set out in § 29 StVZO and is a different body: “the authority competent under state law”. The Bußgeldstelle, in turn, imposes the regulatory fine. Three roles, three addressees.
