Re-test after significant deficiencies
Technical testing centre or monitoring organisation · Anlage VIII
After significant deficiencies, a deadline runs that is worth knowing, because letting it expire is costly: under number 3.1.4.3 of Anlage VIII, the vehicle is to be presented again “at the latest by the expiry of one month after the day of the periodic roadworthiness test”. If it is presented later, or if the test report is missing, the aaSoP or PI has “to carry out a new periodic roadworthiness test instead of the re-test of the deficiency remedy”. A reasonably priced re-test then becomes a full second HU — the month is the entire difference.
Scope is the second difference and the reason the re-test is cheaper: what is examined is the remedy of the identified deficiencies, not the vehicle from scratch. This is exactly what changes once the deadline expires — then the full catalogue of Anlage VIIIa applies again, with brakes, axles, lighting and emissions.
A practical tip that saves trips: the re-test does not necessarily have to take place with the same person, but it does require production of the test report. Number 3.1.4.3 expressly ties the consequence to this too: if the report is not produced, a new periodic roadworthiness test also becomes due. The slip is therefore not paperwork, but the admission ticket.
The result has five levels, not three — numbers 3.1.4.1 to 3.1.4.5 of Anlage VIII. No deficiencies: sticker. Minor deficiencies: the sticker may still be issued, but the deficiencies must be remedied without delay. Significant deficiencies: no sticker, re-test required. Dangerous deficiencies: also no sticker, with greater urgency. And not roadworthy — the strictest level: there, under number 3.1.4.5, “the existing inspection sticker is to be removed”. The vehicle therefore loses its valid sticker on the spot, not only once the deadline expires.
