Modification approval after alterations
Technical testing centre or supervisory organisation · § 19 StVZO
Not every alteration is a case for approval — but which ones are is stated precisely by the law. Under § 19 Abs. 2 Satz 2 StVZO the operating licence lapses if one of three effects occurs: if “the type of vehicle approved in the operating licence is altered”, if “a hazard to road users is to be expected”, or if “exhaust emission or noise behaviour is made worse”. Anyone wishing to check whether their alteration requires approval checks against these three points — not against a list of components.
What preserves the licence is set out in Abs. 3: approval of the modifications by an officially recognised expert after installation. The provision requires it to be carried out without delay — it does not name a fixed deadline in days, which means the opposite of “taking your time”: what matters is acting without culpable delay.
The third part is the one that matters day to day: Abs. 4 requires you to carry the evidence with you — the confirmation of approval or the extract of the authorisation — for as long as the corresponding entry is not in the registration certificate (Zulassungsbescheinigung). Anyone who has had the approval carried out but keeps the evidence at home does not satisfy the provision.
A sentence up front, because it sets the roles straight: TÜV and DEKRA are not authorities. Annex VIII StVZO transfers the Hauptuntersuchung to two private, state-recognised figures — the officially recognised experts or examiners for motor vehicle traffic (aaSoP) of the technical testing centres and the test engineers (PI) of the officially recognised supervisory organisations. They certify, they do not impose sanctions. Who may prohibit the operation of a vehicle is set out in § 29 StVZO and is a different body: “the authority competent under state law”. The Bußgeldstelle, in turn, imposes the regulatory fine. Three roles, three addressees.
